Dear editor,
Two-party systems and the eventual destruction of democracy.
For the last several months, I have listened to the left-leaning bureaucrats behave like petulant school children. I have listened to their channeling of jilted middle school boys all puffed up and full of hormones. It seems to me that the only way to achieve some kind of harmony (i.e. progress) between the parties is to move to a non-partisan government. Conservatism and caution are more likely to promote productive, effective and cooperative behaviors. We must eliminate the destructive animus that serves only to lessen our respect for either party.
Think about it. Through the last few presidential cycles, Bureaucrats have established a pattern, a battle plan, if you will, designed to create ideological separation from their opponents. Policies proposed by the progressive left are continually regressing further to left as time goes by. Likewise, policies proposed by the conservative right migrate further to the right. The total effect is the creation of a widening ideological chasm, purposefully intended to cut off access to the middle ground where compromise is found. Ideological propaganda, intended only to inflame, will ultimately drive the conflict away from cooperation to warfare. The people of this nation deserve a governing body void of peddlers of socialism, fear mongers and obstructionists, who strive only to extinguish the heartbeat of democracy. The Bureaucratic party strives to purchase as many voters as possible with as many green cards, visas and any welfare entitlements necessary to stem the conservative ground swell. How does one solve the problem of an inaccessible middle-ground? We have but to visit the words of our pledge of allegiance to understand where our forefathers stood on this issue:
Letter to the editor
“I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the United States of America and to the REPUBLIC, for which it stands…”
These words clearly suggest the intent of our founding fathers was to make the states the principle actors that provide for the needs of the people through elected representation. The responsibility for the governance of the nation, rest on the president, whose job is to listen to the people, to guide congress toward solving the peoples’ problems and to tend to the healing of our nation’s wounds. Our leaders must continually reaffirm their belief that the federal government is subservient to the will of the people, not to influence of elitists, socialists or radical religions that kill for their party or their gods. There is an old adage that is better to err on the side of caution. Being a conservative is being cautious. Being a member of a republic requires a sense of social and fiscal responsibility. If you want to know if your representative has a leftist bias, you can ask three simple questions and then draw your own conclusions:
When was the last time you voted for a republican candidate?
Do you believe that a government cannot be too large? And
What would be the signs and symptoms of a government grown too large?
Bob R. Holland
These words clearly suggest the intent of our founding fathers was to make the states the principle actors that provide for the needs of the people through elected representation. The responsibility for the governance of the nation, rest on the president, whose job is to listen to the people, to guide congress toward solving the peoples’ problems and to tend to the healing of our nation’s wounds. Our leaders must continually reaffirm their belief that the federal government is subservient to the will of the people, not to influence of elitists, socialists or radical religions that kill for their party or their gods. There is an old adage that is better to err on the side of caution. Being a conservative is being cautious. Being a member of a republic requires a sense of social and fiscal responsibility. If you want to know if your representative has a leftist bias, you can ask three simple questions and then draw your own conclusions:
When was the last time you voted for a republican candidate?
Do you believe that a government cannot be too large? And
What would be the signs and symptoms of a government grown too large?
Bob R. Holland
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
